Skip to content

Menu

Husch Blackwell LLP logo
HomeAboutServicesContactPodcast
Search
Close
 Healthcare Law Insights logo

Healthcare Law Insights

Branding 101 – Trademark Audit: Evaluating Comparative Advertising

By Kathy Rheintgen on June 22, 2016
Posted in Intellectual Property

curtains_000003766048Small1-001-300x199As we discussed previously, a Trademark Audit is an important inventory tool that should be used to be sure that the trademark assets of the company are being properly used and protected. Another important function of a Trademark Audit is to be sure that you are using only your own trademarks; or, if you are using your competitors’ marks that such use is correct and proper.

In general, a company should only be using its own trademarks. However, there are some circumstances where it is acceptable to use a third party’s trademark in your advertising. These exceptions are often referred to as “fair use” of the other’s mark. There are several fair use exceptions that will be discussed over the next couple of weeks. We will start today with a discussion of the proper way to use a competitor’s trademark in a comparative advertisement.

It is possible to avoid trademark infringement while using the trademark of another company in a comparative advertisement. However, there are rules and guidelines that have to be followed to avoid liability. In addition, apart from the trademark infringement issues, comparative advertising can be prone to being considered misleading or deceptive, unless it is done with care.

Comparative advertising is described as “advertising that compares alternative brands on objectively measurable attributes or price, and identifies the alternative brand by name, illustration or other distinctive information.” Comparative advertising is encourage in the U.S. as it gives consumers important information and promotes product improvement and innovation and can provide consumers with useful and important information to help them make rational purchasing decisions. Such advertisements must however be truthful and non-deceptive, and use of a third party’s trademark must be only for comparison purposes. For this reason, only the word mark needs to be used. In comparative advertising there is no legitimate purpose in the use of a competitor’s logo.

The following list provides guidelines to help ensure that your comparative advertising is proper so as to avoid both trademark infringement and false advertising claims:

  1. The intent and connotation of the advertisement must be informational and cannot be used to discredit or unfairly attack your competitor or the competing services. The statements made in the ad must be truthful and non-deceptive. And there should be no material omissions relevant to the statements made.
  2. The named product should be one that is an actual competitor for your goods or services. The comparison must be legitimate and not merely a way to use the competitor’s mark together with yours. In other words, the purpose of the ad should be honest comparison, and not merely to associate your product with your competitor’s product.
  3. The ad should fairly and properly identify the competing product and the company that provides that product. The comparison of the products and/or services should be made between similar properties and the comparison should be made on a feature-to-feature basis. Again, the comparison should be truthful and factual and not be made in a manner that degrades the product or the competing company.
  4. Any comparisons made should be based on facts and not opinion. Any testing needed to make the comparison should be done by an objective, preferably independent, testing source. Ambiguous or subjective comparisons should be avoided.
  5. All the trademarks in the ad should be used in the same manner – the competitor’s trademark should not appear more prominently than your own, as this could lead to a likelihood of confusion. Only the competitor’s word mark should be used. There is no comparative purpose in use of competitor’s logo or slogans.

Our Insight. Your Advantage.

While a company should generally only use its own trademarks, it can be acceptable to use a competitor’s marks in comparative advertising. To ensure your company avoids liability for trademark infringement and/or misleading or deceptive advertisements, follow the above guidelines when planning a comparative advertisement and consult with your trademark counsel regarding the final ad.

Tags: comparative advertising, intellectual property, logo, trademark, trademark audit
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kathy Rheintgen Kathy Rheintgen

Kathy’s intellectual property litigation experience includes managing pharmaceutical, as well as mechanical, patent cases in a variety of trademark and copyright infringement matters and trade secret and antitrust matters. She also has experience in writing infringement opinions for patent, trademark and copyright cases.

Read more about Kathy Rheintgen
Related Posts
pills-colorful492864587
Patent Office Guidance Improves Personalized Medicine’s Long-Term Prognosis
July 10, 2018
stoddart
Sir Stoddart
Husch Blackwell attorneys celebrate Nobel Prize winner
October 10, 2016
Technology -circuit board-144346637
Let’s Stay Together: Negotiating a Successful Joint Technology Development Agreement
September 13, 2016

Stay Connected

RSS Instagram Follow us on Twitter LinkedIn YouTube TikTok

Topics

Archives

Recent Posts

  • DOJ Continues to Eye Clinical Researchers (and the Universities and Hospitals Employing Them)
  • OSHA Pursues Healthcare Workplace Violence Rule
  • Trial Lost, $400+ Million Liability Looming: Quick Takeaways From a Recent False Claims Act Jury Trial
  • Hospital Turns Tables on Whistleblower: Federal Judge Sends Hospital’s Case Against Whistleblower to Trial
  • The Future of Affirmative Action in Medical School Admissions

Additional Resources

  • American Health Information Management Association
  • American Health Law Association
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services – Office of Inspector General

Industry Blogs

  • Health Blog (WSJ)
  • HealthITBuzz
  • HIMSS Blog
  • The Health Care Blog

Husch Blackwell Blogs

  • Association Alert
  • Byte Back
  • Cannabis Law Now
  • International Trade Insights
  • K-12 Legal Insights
  • Labor Relations Law Insider
  • Product Perspective: Complex Tort & Product Law
  • Safety Law Matters
  • The Contractor’s Perspective
Husch Blackwell LLP logo

Healthcare Law Insights

Connect

RSS Instagram Follow us on Twitter LinkedIn YouTube TikTok
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Our Firm

Our industry teams collaborate across practice areas to deliver in-depth solutions to the most complex business challenges. We bring together the best legal minds and reach beyond law to include experienced industry professionals. This approach gives our clients a greater perspective and ensures forward-thinking results. Read More

About Our Practice Group

Our Health Law Team has developed a national reputation for providing sophisticated interdisciplinary counsel to a myriad of healthcare industry clients. Our healthcare attorneys represent leading hospitals and health systems, integrated physician practices, long-term care facilities, pharmacy benefit managers and other healthcare providers on regulatory, compliance, transactional, litigation and operational matters. Read More 

Copyright © 2023, Husch Blackwell LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo