On October 14, 2022, President Joe Biden signed Executive Order 14036, directing the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to consider innovative actions to drive down certain single-source prescription drug costs as the Biden-Harris Administration works to implement the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Act”).

The Act includes provisions targeting Medicare prescription drug costs, which could have wide-ranging effects for any party involved in the pharmaceutical industry, including drug developers, researchers, manufacturers, distributors, insurance companies, pharmacy associations and consumers. Indeed, one company, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., is reportedly halting clinical trials on a drug to treat a rare eye disease in order to evaluate the price limitations imposed by the Act.

The Act creates a framework for the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) to negotiate prices for certain drugs covered under Medicare Parts B and D. Companies that raise prices faster than inflation will be required to pay Medicare a rebate. The Secretary is required to negotiate prices for 10 single-source drugs, beginning in 2026 and increasing each subsequent year through 2029, when 20 single-source drugs will be chosen for pricing negotiation. The drugs that are chosen to enter the negotiation process will be selected from among the 50 drugs with the highest spending for each of Medicare Parts B and D. Certain categories of drugs will not be eligible to be selected for the negotiation process, including generic drugs, drugs with less than $200 million of Medicare spending, certain orphan drugs, and plasma-derived products. “Small Biotech” drugs are also excluded until 2029. Drugs that are 1% or less of all Part D expenditures and are 80% or more of Part D spending as to that manufacturer qualify for the “Small Biotech” exemption.

Once a sole-source drug or authorized generic drug is selected for the negotiation process, the Secretary and the drug manufacturer will enter a negotiation period to determine a “maximum fair price” for such drug. The agreed upon “maximum fair price” for the drug will be published and made available at the publicly available price to “maximum fair price eligible individuals” and the hospitals and providers who furnish health care services to “maximum fair price individuals.” For “Small Biotech” drugs, the Act provides a temporary “maximum fair price” floor of not less than 66 percent of the average non-Federal average manufacturer price for such drug for 2021 (or the first full year following the market entry for such drug). The agreement between Medicare and the drug manufacturer will remain in place until the single-source or authorized generic drug is no longer selected for negotiation.

The “maximum fair price” will not be applied to the pricing of drugs which are subject to an agreement between a provider and manufacturer covered by the federal 340B drug pricing program if the “maximum fair price” ceiling is higher than the 340B program pricing.

Failure of manufacturers to engage in the negotiation process may result in an excise tax beginning at 65% and increasing to a maximum of 95%. Continued non-compliance may result in civil monetary penalties (“CMPs”) of up to $1,000,000 for each day of such violation. Further, additional limitations on judicial or administrative review of certain provisions of the law such as the determination of the “maximum fair price” for the drug and the calculation of certain rebates the manufacturer would pay to Medicare, make compliance considerations paramount as implementation begins.

What this means to you

Under Executive Order 14036, we anticipate HHS will submit a report to Congress in three months, which will outline its plans to further lower drug costs and promote access to new drug therapies for Medicare participants.  Clients involved in any stage of the prescription drug supply chain including pharmacy benefit managers, providers who participate in the federal 340B drug pricing program, prescribers of high-priced single-source drugs, and those that negotiate drug pricing directly with manufacturers should consult with their professional advisors to assess whether they may be subject to the prescription drug pricing reforms imposed by the Inflation Reduction Act and if further steps may be advisable.

Additionally, given the near-term implementation time horizon of 2026 to 2029, sponsors of clinical trials for drugs seeking eventual FDA approval and subsequent coverage by governmental and commercial health insurance, should evaluate these provisions, as well as the Medicare Part D benefit provisions, take effect in 2024.

No matter where you are in the drug supply chain, advance planning for how to approach the negotiation of a “maximum fair price,” handling compliance and reporting requirements, can help you avoid a potential CMP of up to $1 million a day. Such planning will be crucial to implementing a successful and cost-effective single source drug organizational plan under this new pricing framework.

Contact us

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the prescription drug provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, please reach out to your Husch Blackwell attorney.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kimberly Chew Kimberly Chew

As a former life sciences researcher, Kimberly utilizes her ability to understand and explain complex topics to advise clients as to regulatory and legal liability issues. With a focus on litigation and discovery, she manages the discovery program for complex product liability and

As a former life sciences researcher, Kimberly utilizes her ability to understand and explain complex topics to advise clients as to regulatory and legal liability issues. With a focus on litigation and discovery, she manages the discovery program for complex product liability and toxic tort cases as national counsel.

Kimberly works with the firm’s innovative and award-winning Asbestos Litigation team in helping clients manage their risk profiles and in defending large national dockets. Businesses, academic and medical research centers, premises owners, contractors, and manufacturers are among those who rely on Kimberly’s broad range of litigation and regulatory experience. As national coordinating counsel, she coordinates the discovery for thousands of cases—drafting, responding to and preparing discovery and trial support documents for complex cases throughout the nation.

Kimberly has advised clients in matters of product liability, environmental matters, and legal matters regarding Schedule I controlled substances that involve laws such as the Controlled Substances Act, healthcare and research study regulations under the California Business & Professions Code, requirements relating to DEA licensing and registration of controlled substances, CERCLA/Superfund, RCRA, California Proposition 65, and other alleged solid and liquid hazardous waste violations in response to federal and state agency inspections.

Kimberly is the co-founder and co-lead of the firm’s Psychedelic and Emerging Therapies practice group. Kimberly’s background in biotech startups as a research scientist gives her a unique perspective in emerging areas of law such as psychedelic therapeutics. Psychedelics have garnered headline news as breakthrough medicines for the treatment of psychiatric conditions, including PTSD and major depression. Kimberly keeps current on the academic and commercial research and drug discovery efforts in this rapidly developing field so as to assist clients in navigating and complying with complex regulatory issues and protecting and commercializing intellectual property.

Knowledgeable and energetic, Kimberly is known for identifying key strategies in challenging cases, then easily communicating those ideas to clients and legal teams in order to move forward with the best solutions.

Prior to her admission into the state bar, Kimberly externed with the California Attorney General’s Office.

Photo of Kevin Erb Kevin Erb

Kevin’s practice involves guiding clients through the complexities of federal, state, local and international taxation.

Kevin routinely advises business entities, tax-exempt organizations and high net worth individuals on a range of transactional tax matters. He provides tax counsel for business entity formation, mergers,

Kevin’s practice involves guiding clients through the complexities of federal, state, local and international taxation.

Kevin routinely advises business entities, tax-exempt organizations and high net worth individuals on a range of transactional tax matters. He provides tax counsel for business entity formation, mergers, acquisitions and reorganizations.

Kevin also represents clients before the IRS and state tax authorities, preparing IRS protests and appeals and assisting clients facing tax penalties.

For tax-exempt organizations, Kevin partners with clients to secure and maintain tax status and prepares Form 1023 and state-law counterparts.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Kevin advised clients on international, state and local tax considerations arising from work-from-home arrangements. He continues to assist clients with the evolving post-COVID tax landscape.

Prior to entering private law practice, Kevin served as a tax consultant with a Big Four accounting firm, focusing on state and local taxation.

Photo of Noreen Vergara Noreen Vergara

As a Healthcare Regulatory Attorney and former executive, Noreen is a transparent communicator and innovative problem solver with a deep background in operations and risk management.

Noreen’s career in healthcare operations, healthcare compliance and executive leadership began as a behavioral health admissions representative

As a Healthcare Regulatory Attorney and former executive, Noreen is a transparent communicator and innovative problem solver with a deep background in operations and risk management.

Noreen’s career in healthcare operations, healthcare compliance and executive leadership began as a behavioral health admissions representative – she understands the day-to-day regulatory hurdles facing healthcare clients. Most recently, Noreen served as Acting CEO, General Counsel and Chief Human Resources Executive for a national managed behavioral health venture with employees across 50 states. In this position, Noreen leveraged her experience in strategic planning, corporate governance, complex contracts, employment law and compliance. Noreen navigated tough decisions including guiding 500 percent growth over 6 years, moving online quickly during COVID-19 and helping secure the largest contract in company history. Earlier in her career, Noreen collaborated in-house at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), where oversight, peer review, best practices and standards are established by state regulators.