Photo of Andrew Landsman

Andrew Landsman

Andrew’s practice is devoted to helping his clients develop strategies for protecting and monetizing their valuable intellectual property assets. He is a registered patent attorney and counsels clients on all types of IP, including patent and trademark applications, negotiating and closing IP license agreements, freedom-to-operate and patentability opinions, and trademark clearance and availability. He works particularly often with clients in the life science and medical device spaces.

This post is the third in our three-part series, Gearing Up for HTLH USA 2025, where our team of attorneys will share insights on intellectual property, equity, and exit strategies and how these issues intersect in the transactional context.

HLTH USA is a whirlwind—partnering, investor meetings, and press all compressed into a few fast-moving days. That intensity can be great, but it can also be risky for protecting and maximizing the value of your intellectual property. In the rush to network, pitch, and show off your innovation, it is easy to jeopardize your patent or trade secret rights by disclosing too much detail in a conversation or showing more than you should at your booth.

As HLTH approaches, it is worth pausing to consider how a thoughtful IP strategy can protect your company’s most valuable assets not only during HLTH itself, but long afterward.

Capturing innovation is just as important as protecting it. A simple invention disclosure form — recording the technical problem, your solution, key data, and alternative embodiments — can become the backbone of a provisional patent filing. Filing quickly, before public disclosures, is critical. But speed shouldn’t come at the expense of substance. A well-prepared provisional application, rich with enabling detail and variations, buys you time to refine claims and sequence international filings. Resist the temptation to file a “skeleton” provisional unless you have no other option.

In medtech and life sciences, it is often valuable to cover not just the device or system, but also methods of use (including physician workflows), manufacturing or assay methods, and the software or algorithms that deliver a concrete technical improvement. Enabling disclosure for a variety of embodiments can make all the difference when it comes to enforcement or licensing down the road.

This post is the fifth in our five-part series, Navigating Life Sciences Transactions, where our team of attorneys provides essential strategies and insights for successful life sciences transactions.

Throughout this series, we’ve explored the key elements of successful life sciences transactions—from structuring collaborations and securing funding to protecting intellectual property and navigating regulatory complexities.

Yet, even when companies understand these fundamentals, transactions don’t always go as planned. In our work with biotech, medtech, digital health, and research-driven companies, we’ve seen common missteps that can slow deals down, create compliance risks, or weaken long-term business outcomes.

This post is the third in our five-part series, Navigating Life Sciences Transactions, where our team of attorneys provides essential strategies and insights for successful life sciences transactions.

With the SXSW Health and MedTech conference in full swing, it’s a good time to reflect on some fundamental Intellectual Property (IP) strategies that can help safeguard your Life Sciences and MedTech business and maximize its value now and into the future.

IP is often one of the most valuable assets a company can own. Whether you’re preparing to sell a business, enter into a joint venture, or acquire another company, understanding the scope of your IP portfolio is essential. For in-house counsel, founders, corporate executives, and other legal professionals, navigating the complexities of IP ownership and licensing can make or break a deal.