Fraud & Abuse

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued an interesting report in September that analyzed civil and criminal healthcare fraud cases.  The report is based on 2010 data from the various agencies in the federal government charged with investigating and pursuing healthcare fraud.  For purposes of this blog entry, I’m going to focus on some key numbers on the civil side. 

In 2010, the government investigated a total of 10,187 “subjects.”  Subjects included entities such as hospitals, medical clinics, and pharmacies, as well as individuals that provide services at these entities.

  • Of the 10,187 subjects investigated, 2,339 of the subjects were related to civil investigations, rather than criminal investigations.
  • Of the 2,339 civil investigations, nearly 20% of these were hospitals.  Medical centers or clinics made up another almost 18% of the total 2,339 civil investigations.
  • Of the total 2,339 civil investigations, the government actually pursued cases against 1,087.
  • Of the 1,087 civil cases the government pursued, the government either settled with, or won a judgment against, 55% of these subjects.
  • Of the 55% civil cases that either settled or resulted in a judgment for the government, 44% of these subjects were hospitals or medical facilities (medical practices or clinics).

These numbers are interesting because it shows that hospital or medical facilities make up over one third of all civil investigations and almost half of all settlements.  It is also interesting to look at the number of investigations that were based on qui tam filings.  A qui tam is a civil False Claims Act case brought by a private citizen, “relator” or “whistleblower,” on behalf of the government.  Once a case is filed, the Department of Justice and the Office of Inspector General are charged with investigating and making a determination about whether the government should pursue the case by becoming a party to the litigation.  In many cases, if the government believes the allegations have merit, the government will attempt to settle before actually litigating.

On September 25, 2012, two members of the Husch Blackwell Healthcare team, Brian Bewley and David Pursell, presented a webinar discussing:

  • An overview of Stark
  • Stark overpayment reporting requirements
  • Steps to take after discovering a potential Stark violation

As former Senior Counsel in the Office of Inspector General for Health and Human Services and…

The heads of both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sent a joint letter on Monday, September 24, to five hospital industry groups, including the American Hospital Association, threatening to prosecute providers that use electronic health records (EHR) to “game” the system and improperly obtain federal monies for…

In August, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services released a report describing inappropriate and questionable billing by home health agencies.  The OIG conducted the study because recent investigations and studies showed that home health agencies are vulnerable to fraud, abuse, and waste.  The OIG identified inappropriate claims by examining claims data from home health, inpatient hospital, and skilled nursing facilities.  The OIG also looked at HHAs that billed unusually high amounts according to at least one of its six measures of questionable billing.  The report determined that Medicare inappropriately paid $5M for home health claims with three specific errors in 2010.  To read the report, click here.

Attorney Elizabeth Hogue prepared a concise, helpful summary of the report as follows:

The OIG issued Report OEI-04-11-00240 in August, 2012, entitled “Inappropriate and Questionable Billing by Medicare Home Health Agencies.” Unlike some other guidance published the OIG, this Report provides detailed information about inappropriate and questionable billing practices by home health agencies (HHA’s). Specifically, the OIG concluded that HHA billing is questionable or unusually high on the six measures below, if greater than the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range. The six measures are as follows:

 1. High average outlier payment amounts per beneficiary

According to the OIG, HHA’s with outlier payments above $403 per beneficiary have unusually high outlier payments and are likely engaging in questionable billing practices.


Earlier this month, the US Dept. of Health and Human Services Office of inspector General (OIG) issued a report regarding suspicious billing practices by community mental health clinics (CMHCS).  OIG scrutiny of CMHCs, particularly with respect to partial hospitalization programs (PHPs), is probably not a surprise to those in the Texas mental health provider community…

Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard arguments on whether lawyers are allowed to bring whistleblower lawsuits against their employer and client (U.S. ex rel. Fair Laboratory Practices Associates vs. Quest Diagnostics Inc. et al.).  A U.S. District Court threw out the case in April of 2011, ruling that…

On August 10, 2012, HHSC-OIG posted proposed regulations that would expand the power and reach of the Office of Inspector General.  These regulations broaden the net so that persons who are affiliated with a provider can be sanctioned along with a provider as a result of such affiliation, and “affiliate” is broadly defined.  These regulations…

HHS and DOJ today announced that Federal law enforcement is teaming up with private insurance organizations in the fight against health care fraud.  While the details of how this partnership will work are unclear, the press releases issued by both DOJ and HHS indicate that the private and public sectors will share information with each other…