Government Issues

The Sixth Circuit recently made some interesting findings related to the knowledge standard in the False Claims Act (“FCA”) and whether maximizing profits is evidence of fraud.

The knowledge standard in the FCA may create a disincentive for defendants to litigate cases brought by the government, especially considering the standard for liability can be met by the government demonstrating that the defendant acted with reckless disregard or in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the claim.   See 31 U.S.C. § 3729.  In light of this fairly low standard, it is no secret that some defendants decide it is less costly to settle a case, rather than engaging in protracted litigation with the government.  However, in one recent case the defendant, Renal Care Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, decided to fight back against allegations it defrauded the government of millions of dollars while providing dialysis treatments to Medicare beneficiaries suffering from end-stage renal disease.  Renal Care lost the first battle when the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the United States and awarded the government $82.6 million in damages and penalties.  On appeal, however, Renal Care secured a major victory when the court of appeals reversed the district court’s judgments on grounds that Renal Care did not act in reckless disregard under the FCA.

Without going into the specific facts alleged by the government, there are two important findings from this Sixth Circuit decision worth noting.  First, the Sixth Circuit determined that Renal Care did not act recklessly.  Per the Sixth Circuit, a defendant can be held liable under the FCA by showing that it acted with actual knowledge or constructive knowledge.  United States v. Renal Care Group, et al., No. 11-5779, slip op. at 17 (6th Cir. Oct. 5, 2012).  Constructive knowledge can be proven by demonstrating that the defendant acted in deliberate ignorance of, or with reckless disregard to, the truth or falsity.  One of the facts relied on by the court in reaching its decision on the knowledge requirement is that Renal Care sought legal counsel, who in turn sought clarification from CMS on what appears to be fairly ambiguous regulations.  The court focused on this fact, in addition to some others, in reaching its conclusion that Renal Care did not act recklessly. 

On September 25, 2012, two members of the Husch Blackwell Healthcare team, Brian Bewley and David Pursell, presented a webinar discussing:

  • An overview of Stark
  • Stark overpayment reporting requirements
  • Steps to take after discovering a potential Stark violation

As former Senior Counsel in the Office of Inspector General for Health and Human Services and…

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) passed new and consolidated rules on October 14, 2012. According to the OIG’s counsel, the new rules increase the likelihood of litigation, increase revenue for the state, lower the State fiscal burden and increase the State’s ability to exercise a sanction on providers.
On December 1, 2011…

The heads of both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sent a joint letter on Monday, September 24, to five hospital industry groups, including the American Hospital Association, threatening to prosecute providers that use electronic health records (EHR) to “game” the system and improperly obtain federal monies for…

In August, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services released a report describing inappropriate and questionable billing by home health agencies.  The OIG conducted the study because recent investigations and studies showed that home health agencies are vulnerable to fraud, abuse, and waste.  The OIG identified inappropriate claims by examining claims data from home health, inpatient hospital, and skilled nursing facilities.  The OIG also looked at HHAs that billed unusually high amounts according to at least one of its six measures of questionable billing.  The report determined that Medicare inappropriately paid $5M for home health claims with three specific errors in 2010.  To read the report, click here.

Attorney Elizabeth Hogue prepared a concise, helpful summary of the report as follows:

The OIG issued Report OEI-04-11-00240 in August, 2012, entitled “Inappropriate and Questionable Billing by Medicare Home Health Agencies.” Unlike some other guidance published the OIG, this Report provides detailed information about inappropriate and questionable billing practices by home health agencies (HHA’s). Specifically, the OIG concluded that HHA billing is questionable or unusually high on the six measures below, if greater than the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range. The six measures are as follows:

 1. High average outlier payment amounts per beneficiary

According to the OIG, HHA’s with outlier payments above $403 per beneficiary have unusually high outlier payments and are likely engaging in questionable billing practices.

Last week, Paul Ryan accepted the nomination for Vice President.  In his acceptance speech, he cited “Obamacare” as the greatest threat to Medicare, but many hospitals view the expansion of coverage for low-income individuals positively.  More and more community hospitals are urging their state governments to accept payments for expanded Medicaid programs under the…

On August 10, 2012, HHSC-OIG posted proposed regulations that would expand the power and reach of the Office of Inspector General.  These regulations broaden the net so that persons who are affiliated with a provider can be sanctioned along with a provider as a result of such affiliation, and “affiliate” is broadly defined.  These regulations…

HHSC is performing certification/recertification review of all Durable Medical Equipment (DME) providers.  Over the past few weeks HHSC has been making site visits to Medicaid enrolled DME suppliers to verify operations and enrollment data.  Medicaid DME suppliers must cooperate with the HHSC investigators; a failure to do so may result in termination of a supplier’s…

On August 16, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (PPACA’s) restriction on expansion by physician-owned hospitals.  The lawsuit was initially filed in the Eastern District of Texas by the physician-owned hospital trade group (Physicians Hospitals of America) and a physician-owned

…