Photo of Kimberly Chew

Kimberly Chew

Kimberly is a seasoned professional with a rich background in biotech research, leveraging her extensive experience to guide clients through the intricate landscape of clinical trials and academic research compliance.

As the co-founder and co-lead of the firm’s Psychedelic and Emerging Therapies practice group, Kimberly is particularly inspired by the potential of psychedelic therapeutics to address mental health conditions like PTSD. She skillfully navigates the legal intricacies surrounding these therapies, providing guidance through the clinical trial process at both state and federal levels.

Follow:Read more about Kimberly ChewKimberly's Linkedin Profile

Earlier this month, Judge Rakoff of the Southern District of New York issued a first-of-its-kind ruling in United States v. Heppner. The case involved a criminal defendant, Heppner, who used a public generative AI platform (Claude) to “prepare reports that outlined his defense strategy (what he might argue with respect to the facts and the law that [his attorneys] anticipated that the government might be charging”). Although the defendant prepared the documents on his own, he later shared them with his attorneys. Heppner argued that these AI-generated documents should be protected by attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine.

Everyone is talking about AI, but not everyone understands what AI is. AI, or artificial intelligence, refers to technology that enables machines to perform tasks that traditionally required human thinking—things like reading, writing, analyzing information, and making decisions.

A particularly powerful form of AI today is the large language model (or LLM), which is a type of AI trained on vast amounts of text that allows it to understand and generate human language, making it the engine behind popular tools like chatbots and AI writing assistants. Think ChatGPT or Google Gemini.

Blog SeriesConference Post (1)

This is the third in a series of articles designed to provide SXSW and LSI USA ’26 attendees and other MedTech professionals with practical considerations for efficiently executing mission-critical life science deals. On March 15, during SXSW, Husch Blackwell’s healthcare team will host two panels, bringing together founders and investors from healthcare, technology, and early-stage companies for candid discussion, practical insights, and plenty of time to connect.

Register here.

Doctor working on laptop computer

In my November 2025 blog post, I discussed the uncertainty surrounding the DEA’s then-pending telemedicine rule and its implications for ketamine clinics. At that time, the future of pandemic-era telehealth prescribing flexibilities was unclear, and clinics across the country were bracing for the possibility of a significant regulatory shift at the end of 2025.

The regulatory landscape for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment records is changing—and the impact will extend far beyond traditional addiction treatment programs. With treatment options for SUD limited, some providers are exploring ketamine as a potential therapy due to its effects on glutamatergic neurotransmission.[i] Additionally, psychedelic-assisted therapies involving certain Schedule I substances – such as psilocybin, ibogaine, and MDMA – are currently being studied by researchers as potential treatments for SUDs.[ii] While these investigational therapies are not yet available in clinical practice and the new federal privacy rules do not apply to research records, providers should be aware of the evolving treatment landscape as these therapies move closer to potential approval and clinical use.

Telehealth

The legal and regulatory landscape for ketamine clinics is shifting once again, as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) prepares to release its “Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescription of Controlled Medications.” While the full text of this rule is not yet public, its very existence signals that the DEA may continue the pandemic-era telehealth flexibilities that have proven vital for many clinics and patients. For owners and operators of ketamine clinics, understanding what’s at stake and how to prepare is more important than ever.

Laboratory Testing

In June 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) announced a new item in its Work Plan: “Medicare Payments for Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in 2024.” This annual review, mandated by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA), focuses on analyzing the top 25 laboratory tests by Medicare expenditures for the previous calendar year. For clinical laboratories and healthcare providers, this announcement signals the need to pay close attention to billing practices, compliance programs, and potential audit risks.

Silver Spring, MD, USA - June 25, 2022: The FDA White Oak Campus

On June 17, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher (CNPV) program, a bold initiative designed to accelerate the review of therapies addressing critical national health priorities and potentially marking a significant shift in the U.S. regulatory landscape for drug development. For life sciences companies, this program presents both a unique opportunity and new strategic considerations; however, while the promise of a much shorter review window is enticing, life sciences innovators would be wise to proceed with caution.

Scientists or physicians analyze sample

Audit preparedness is essential for every clinical research site. By operationalizing compliance in your daily procedures, you can effectively mitigate risk and ensure smooth inspections. Start by thoroughly educating key personnel on current regulations and any changes, and involve them in risk identification and mitigation strategies. Foster a culture of shared responsibility through ongoing training and open communication. Keep detailed documentation of the reasoning behind your procedures and policies, and store all standard operating procedures (SOPs) in a central, easily accessible location. Finally, implement a robust system for managing data and documents to ensure that all necessary information is readily available for internal and external monitors, as well as regulatory agencies.

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to dominate headlines—not just for its technological leaps, but also for the policies shaping its future. In a major development, a new Republican-backed tax bill, released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee on May 11, 2025, seeks to preempt states from regulating AI models for the next decade. If passed, this bill would prevent state laws governing AI systems, allowing only limited exceptions for measures that simply facilitate or streamline AI development and deployment. Laws attempting to regulate artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decisions systems would be disallowed during the 10 year period.

This proposed federal approach aligns with the current administration’s emphasis on AI innovation over regulation, reflecting a belief that a unified, national policy will spur American competitiveness in this rapidly evolving field.